|
Visualization literacy
Information visualizations can be read on two levels. First, the
information they present; their intended meaning. Second, the visualization
parameters: simplifications, conventions, assumptions, and lies used
for expediency of presentation and background of the producer.
|
|
||||||
|
Escher drawings revel in the interplay and contradictions inherent
in the representation of complex three dimensional space on the picture
plane. Like Escher figures, information designs explore the relationship
between the medium of representation and object, but one must be literate
in information graphics to appreciate this rich interplay between
representation and object.
All information graphics make assumptions, simplifications, and tricks which remain invisible to readers without literacy in information graphics. People lacking fluency in information graphics are able to see only what protrudes up out of the ocean, while the remaining meaning lies underneath, an invisible mass of meaning, conventions, and simplifications. |
|||||||
|
These tricks are material necessities of information visualization
which, by nature, seeks to modulate complex realities through
readable abstractions and simplifications. Conventions such as false color and
scale are necessary for solving problems of presentation and cognition.
In order to properly read and write information graphics one must become literate in the language they speak. One must not only be capable of reading the information they present, their intended meaning, but fluent in reading the invisible information these graphics contain: the producers background, tradeoffs made for visualization purposes, data sources, and the entire array of visualization tricks information graphic designers use. |